Blog Feeds
05-03 08:40 AM
This past week we saw people from all walks of life debating about this unreasonable law. Even Arizona law enforcement personnel feel that this is going to create more harm than good. The shine of light to the Arizona law - if there is one - is that it has shaken our nation's leaders into dealing with the need for immigration reform. In large numbers in Arizona and nationwide, people have turned out protesting the law. For more information about the new Arizona Law email me.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/05/san_diego_immigration_lawyer_p_1.html)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/05/san_diego_immigration_lawyer_p_1.html)
wallpaper There are curly hairstyles for
akhilmahajan
07-21 11:23 AM
is it only for physicians?
my wife is a dentist.
my wife is a dentist.
nocomment
09-23 09:22 PM
my pd march 2002 pending 485 any estimated time to get 485 approved?
EB2 or EB3?
EB2 or EB3?
2011 medium-thick-wavy-hairstyle.
Neocrack
11-02 09:14 AM
I have a pending I 485 under EB3 I. My wife could become a US citizen early next year. We would like to file another I 485 based on the spouse US citizen catagory.
Do I have to withdraw the I 485 filed under the EB ?
I am currently using the EAD & AP derived from the current pending I 485 what happens to them. Do I file for 2 different sets of EAD?
Please advice..
Thanks
Neo
Do I have to withdraw the I 485 filed under the EB ?
I am currently using the EAD & AP derived from the current pending I 485 what happens to them. Do I file for 2 different sets of EAD?
Please advice..
Thanks
Neo
more...
blog30
08-03 04:39 PM
Hello,
My I-140 has been received by USCIS in December 2008. I have just got my approval notice.
Does anybody know if I can fill an I-485 for my son, who turned 21 in May 2008?
Thanks
My I-140 has been received by USCIS in December 2008. I have just got my approval notice.
Does anybody know if I can fill an I-485 for my son, who turned 21 in May 2008?
Thanks
aanakkoddan
07-06 06:27 PM
My LD 01/31/2003 I485 date 10/20/03 extending my EAD 4th time. Stuck in backlog center TX. Any one recently got from TX backlog?
more...
Ann Ruben
03-22 09:11 AM
gcformeornot is correct. You cannot "transfer" an I-140 approval, but you can keep and use the PD for any subsequent I-140. Once a new LC is approved, a copy of the I-140 approval notice with the 10/2007 PD should be included in the new I-140 submission along with a request to use the old PD on the new I-140 approval notice.
2010 dresses Short Curly Hairstyles
stxvr
11-26 12:07 PM
I am on H1B and planning to go for CP. I have to fill the form DS-230 for this and submit to VSF office.
Currently I am on H1B extension and I don't have visa stamped for this extension on my passport.
In this form DS-230 I need to fill field name "Present Address".
I have following question:
- In this form what should I fill my present address
Indian address
OR
US address.
(what I think: I think when I will submit the forms to VSF I will be in india and at that time i will not have the valid visa to enter USA. So I think I should fill the indian address.)
What do you guys suggest?
Currently I am on H1B extension and I don't have visa stamped for this extension on my passport.
In this form DS-230 I need to fill field name "Present Address".
I have following question:
- In this form what should I fill my present address
Indian address
OR
US address.
(what I think: I think when I will submit the forms to VSF I will be in india and at that time i will not have the valid visa to enter USA. So I think I should fill the indian address.)
What do you guys suggest?
more...
vikki76
07-14 08:12 PM
Yes- you can start sole proprietorship on EAD and there is no need to inform USCIS. Only complications will be taxes, nothing else.
Sole Proprietorship should not become your main employer if you are main (primary) applicant of 485 application.
Sole Proprietorship should not become your main employer if you are main (primary) applicant of 485 application.
hair Modern curly medium hairstyles
kirupa
07-30 02:40 PM
Added :)
more...
jaggu80
07-21 02:08 PM
I NEED HELP from someone who can direct me in this situation
my h1b expired on june30, 2010 and i filed with the same employer for a new job position related to same profession on june 24 2010. but unfortunately uscis says that they have nothing on their system yet and no receipt of notice by july 20 . my cheques are also not yet cashed. i have fedex receipt proof it being received at uscis center on june 25th 2010. Now what should i do in this situation.
should i file again with premium processing explaining uscis that my file has been misplaced or has not even processed or filed yet though received on june 25th as per fedex receipt and wait in us till what happens.
i will really appreciate any help or comments in this situation
my h1b expired on june30, 2010 and i filed with the same employer for a new job position related to same profession on june 24 2010. but unfortunately uscis says that they have nothing on their system yet and no receipt of notice by july 20 . my cheques are also not yet cashed. i have fedex receipt proof it being received at uscis center on june 25th 2010. Now what should i do in this situation.
should i file again with premium processing explaining uscis that my file has been misplaced or has not even processed or filed yet though received on june 25th as per fedex receipt and wait in us till what happens.
i will really appreciate any help or comments in this situation
hot Curly Hairstyles For Medium
Exothika
10-08 09:42 PM
I have a frame on my main Window.xaml, when I click a link on the main Window, a Page.xaml page should appear. Only when I click the link, the page should load, but the page like auto runs without even displaying the main window. The main Window disappears in a flash and the Page.xaml appears. What should I do??
Between, I use MS Expression Blend & C# for the development of my application.
Between, I use MS Expression Blend & C# for the development of my application.
more...
house Medium Wavy Hairstyles (38 of
shaji_p_j
08-05 01:26 AM
I am on H1B and my wife is in H4 here. She is a nurse and can apply for the AOS before Aug 17 .But she does not have all certificate that makes her AOS approved at this time. We hope that we can obtain the certificate (Visa Screen certificate) by the time the RFE comes. But it is a 50-50 chance only. So what could be the best option for us and consequences of each.
My case (h1B)
1. I also apply for AOS with her so that I can get aGC along with her but do not use the EAD .
2. I apply for the AOS later but before her AOS approved.
My wife case (h4)
1. Apply for the AOS but do not use EAD
2. Apply AOS and use EAD.
Also do you know around when the USCIS issues RFE once the application is recieved?
I really appreciate your advice in this.
Shaji.
My case (h1B)
1. I also apply for AOS with her so that I can get aGC along with her but do not use the EAD .
2. I apply for the AOS later but before her AOS approved.
My wife case (h4)
1. Apply for the AOS but do not use EAD
2. Apply AOS and use EAD.
Also do you know around when the USCIS issues RFE once the application is recieved?
I really appreciate your advice in this.
Shaji.
tattoo pictures Haircuts Medium
test101
07-09 10:53 AM
I'm near boston i'll join
more...
pictures Taylor Swift#39;s Curly Hair
ShinX001
03-18 08:42 AM
So I am trying to create an ellipse which has a few bumps in its shape(path),
I want to be able to dynamically create new shapes that have a different
path each time a new one is created. Any one have any idea about how
to go abotu the concept for this?
Dont need code just need ideas on best ways to go about this.
Thanks in advanced.... :mario:
I want to be able to dynamically create new shapes that have a different
path each time a new one is created. Any one have any idea about how
to go abotu the concept for this?
Dont need code just need ideas on best ways to go about this.
Thanks in advanced.... :mario:
dresses Lindsay Lohan Wavy Hairstyle
cosh1b2
04-05 04:23 PM
I had been in H-1B status and was laid off. My H-1B was withdrawn by my company on 12/31/2010. I applied for COS to B2 and received the USCIS receipt notice on Dec 17th, a few days before my H-1B was withdrawn.
Later on Feb 2nd, 2011, I received the approval notice from USCIS for B2 valid from 02/02/2011 to 04/29/2011(I had informed in my application that this would be my date of departure.) My question is: What status would I be from the date my H-1B was withdrawn till the B2 validity start date?
Forum members, please clarify.
Thanks
Later on Feb 2nd, 2011, I received the approval notice from USCIS for B2 valid from 02/02/2011 to 04/29/2011(I had informed in my application that this would be my date of departure.) My question is: What status would I be from the date my H-1B was withdrawn till the B2 validity start date?
Forum members, please clarify.
Thanks
more...
makeup Modern Long Wavy Haircut
paragpujara
04-11 02:41 PM
I have been working for Everest Business Solutions, Inc since 09/2005. They are very professional. So far i am happy with them and they filed my GC as they promised. Regular in Pay and help you out whenever needed. My wife is also working for the same company.
Let me know if you need further information.
Let me know if you need further information.
girlfriend Tyra Banks Hairstyles 2010
cbd80
09-15 09:09 PM
I transfer my H1B to company B and works for company B. Now suppose if I want to go back to company A after six months and want to work for company A, does the h1b transfer required? (means, does company A requires to file whole h1b petition again?) Here my petition (I-797) with company A is still valid. And suppose if I want to go back to company A after 4 years, at that time my petition (I-797) with company A might be expired, does the company A requires to file new petition (tranfer) or just the extension?
hairstyles hairstyles formal long wavy
gchopes
12-29 11:23 AM
That's what even I am planning to tell them. We full time employees don't work on a specific 1 project. I have got a letter from employer with job duties. Anything else needed?
sanjay05
01-29 12:26 PM
I had infopass appointment yesterday at Dallas. I am waiting for my FP (Check my signature). It was rather simple. They checked the id and the appointment at the outside window and issued a token for me and my spouse (I went alone but took appointment for 2). By the time I cleared security and went inside I already had my token number announced. The IO asked me the reason I was visiting and she checked the 485 notice, punched in something in her system and said you should receive your FP notice within 30 days. She did same for my spouse. I was in and out of the building in 10 mins.
Macaca
07-20 07:56 AM
Breakdown in Relations in the Senate Hobbles Its Ability to Get Things Done (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/20/washington/20cong.html?_r=1&oref=slogin) By CARL HULSE (http://www.nytimes.com/gst/emailus.html) New York Times, July 20, 2007
WASHINGTON, July 19 � Arlen Specter is a senior United States senator who expects to be allowed his say on the Senate floor. So he bristled when Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, brusquely cut him off at the end of the Iraq debate.
�The leadership is setting a dictatorial tone,� Mr. Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, said Thursday, still furious over his treatment the day before. �Senators didn�t get here to be pushed around.�
It may seem small-minded to bicker over a few words at the end of a 24-hour debate. But the clash between the two veteran senators is evidence of a larger breakdown in relations in the Senate, a deterioration in cooperation that is hobbling the Senate�s ability to get things done. The situation is not likely to improve with a presidential election on the horizon.
As the cots were rolled away and lawmakers left for a decent night�s rest after the around-the-clock debate that ended � like others this year � in stalemate, lawmakers of both parties said they had rarely seen the tone so poisonous and the willingness to work together on the floor at such a low ebb.
�The last vestiges of courtesy seem to be going out the window,� said Senator Trent Lott, the Mississippi Republican who has served as majority and minority leader. �Every time I think the Senate � Republican or Democrat � has gone to a point where you can�t go any lower, we go lower.�
It is hardly startling that members of the two parties do not see eye to eye. And the spirit of bipartisanship in the Senate always rises and falls depending on the subject and the election calendar. But seven months into the new Democratic regime, the environment seems unusually hostile. Occasionally, senators do, too, as exhibited in a Sunday television exchange between Senators Jim Webb, Democrat of Virginia, and Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, that looked for a moment as if it might turn physical as the two men argued about the war in Iraq.
The angry attacks nearly spiraled out of control Thursday night as the two parties lobbed political bombs at each other during the windup of work on an otherwise popular higher education measure.
After Republicans brought forward proposals intended to embarrass Democrats on terror detainees and union elections, Democrats countered with a resolution urging President Bush not to pardon I. Lewis Libby Jr., a former top White House aide. Republicans struck back with a resolution deploring the pardons issued by President Bill Clinton.
The floor descended into chaos as members of the two parties glowered at one another across the aisle. Evidently recognizing they had gone too far, party leaders pulled back and agreed to try to finish the education bill as Democrats struck their Libby proposal from the record.
Hard feelings have consequences. Without agreements between the leaders of the opposing parties, the Senate has been plunged into a procedural knife fight, with Democrats forced to scramble to find 60 votes not just on contentious issues like an Iraq withdrawal plan, but on once-routine matters like motions to proceed to a spending bill.
The feuding has spilled into subjects that would seem to hold the potential for common ground, like antiterror legislation and lobbying reform, and will doubtless tie up other measures to come.
Democrats contend that Republicans have embarked on a strategy of delay, using Senate rules to chew up scarce legislative time and deny Democrats any accomplishments. Republicans complain that Democrats are trying to jam through objectionable bills and are mainly interested in building a political case for 2008. The relationship between Mr. Reid and his Republican counterpart, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, has cooled after it was initially thought the two Senate tacticians would be able to do business.
Senator Edward M. Kennedy, the Massachusetts Democrat who has been in the Senate for more than four decades, said he was not sure bipartisanship was at an all-time low, but acknowledged things were tense.
�The fact the Senate is so evenly divided makes big causes out of smaller events,� Mr. Kennedy said.
Besides the narrow 51-49 majority Democrats enjoy, lawmakers and others attribute what senators deplore as a lack of comity to various reasons, including the emotions surrounding the Iraq war debate, a Republican payback for Democratic stalling in recent years and pure political maneuvering in a hot-house environment.
Mr. Reid on Thursday blamed Republican ideology, saying the Senate�s conservative contingent was unwilling to swallow legislation sought by most Americans.
�Republicans in the Senate do not represent mainstream Republicans around the country,� he said.
Members of both houses have been contending for years that the sort of personal interaction that can lead lawmakers to overcome partisan differences has been on the decline, leaving Congress polarized.
But Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Specter and others say they find that committee leaders still tend to be able to work together. And a bipartisan group of senior lawmakers put together the Senate�s immigration proposal, though it went down in flames to the broader political divide in Congress.
Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, the chairman of the Armed Services Committee who has been in the heat of the battle over the Iraq legislation, said he did not believe feelings were frayed beyond repair.
�The Senate is a unique place where wills are tested, and this was a very important issue that people have very strong feelings on,� he said, referring to the Iraq debate. �Instead of fighting over it physically, there are battles that are fought on the floor of the Senate. But these are important disagreements and they should be aired.
�Isn�t that what we are here for?�
WASHINGTON, July 19 � Arlen Specter is a senior United States senator who expects to be allowed his say on the Senate floor. So he bristled when Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, brusquely cut him off at the end of the Iraq debate.
�The leadership is setting a dictatorial tone,� Mr. Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, said Thursday, still furious over his treatment the day before. �Senators didn�t get here to be pushed around.�
It may seem small-minded to bicker over a few words at the end of a 24-hour debate. But the clash between the two veteran senators is evidence of a larger breakdown in relations in the Senate, a deterioration in cooperation that is hobbling the Senate�s ability to get things done. The situation is not likely to improve with a presidential election on the horizon.
As the cots were rolled away and lawmakers left for a decent night�s rest after the around-the-clock debate that ended � like others this year � in stalemate, lawmakers of both parties said they had rarely seen the tone so poisonous and the willingness to work together on the floor at such a low ebb.
�The last vestiges of courtesy seem to be going out the window,� said Senator Trent Lott, the Mississippi Republican who has served as majority and minority leader. �Every time I think the Senate � Republican or Democrat � has gone to a point where you can�t go any lower, we go lower.�
It is hardly startling that members of the two parties do not see eye to eye. And the spirit of bipartisanship in the Senate always rises and falls depending on the subject and the election calendar. But seven months into the new Democratic regime, the environment seems unusually hostile. Occasionally, senators do, too, as exhibited in a Sunday television exchange between Senators Jim Webb, Democrat of Virginia, and Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, that looked for a moment as if it might turn physical as the two men argued about the war in Iraq.
The angry attacks nearly spiraled out of control Thursday night as the two parties lobbed political bombs at each other during the windup of work on an otherwise popular higher education measure.
After Republicans brought forward proposals intended to embarrass Democrats on terror detainees and union elections, Democrats countered with a resolution urging President Bush not to pardon I. Lewis Libby Jr., a former top White House aide. Republicans struck back with a resolution deploring the pardons issued by President Bill Clinton.
The floor descended into chaos as members of the two parties glowered at one another across the aisle. Evidently recognizing they had gone too far, party leaders pulled back and agreed to try to finish the education bill as Democrats struck their Libby proposal from the record.
Hard feelings have consequences. Without agreements between the leaders of the opposing parties, the Senate has been plunged into a procedural knife fight, with Democrats forced to scramble to find 60 votes not just on contentious issues like an Iraq withdrawal plan, but on once-routine matters like motions to proceed to a spending bill.
The feuding has spilled into subjects that would seem to hold the potential for common ground, like antiterror legislation and lobbying reform, and will doubtless tie up other measures to come.
Democrats contend that Republicans have embarked on a strategy of delay, using Senate rules to chew up scarce legislative time and deny Democrats any accomplishments. Republicans complain that Democrats are trying to jam through objectionable bills and are mainly interested in building a political case for 2008. The relationship between Mr. Reid and his Republican counterpart, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, has cooled after it was initially thought the two Senate tacticians would be able to do business.
Senator Edward M. Kennedy, the Massachusetts Democrat who has been in the Senate for more than four decades, said he was not sure bipartisanship was at an all-time low, but acknowledged things were tense.
�The fact the Senate is so evenly divided makes big causes out of smaller events,� Mr. Kennedy said.
Besides the narrow 51-49 majority Democrats enjoy, lawmakers and others attribute what senators deplore as a lack of comity to various reasons, including the emotions surrounding the Iraq war debate, a Republican payback for Democratic stalling in recent years and pure political maneuvering in a hot-house environment.
Mr. Reid on Thursday blamed Republican ideology, saying the Senate�s conservative contingent was unwilling to swallow legislation sought by most Americans.
�Republicans in the Senate do not represent mainstream Republicans around the country,� he said.
Members of both houses have been contending for years that the sort of personal interaction that can lead lawmakers to overcome partisan differences has been on the decline, leaving Congress polarized.
But Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Specter and others say they find that committee leaders still tend to be able to work together. And a bipartisan group of senior lawmakers put together the Senate�s immigration proposal, though it went down in flames to the broader political divide in Congress.
Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, the chairman of the Armed Services Committee who has been in the heat of the battle over the Iraq legislation, said he did not believe feelings were frayed beyond repair.
�The Senate is a unique place where wills are tested, and this was a very important issue that people have very strong feelings on,� he said, referring to the Iraq debate. �Instead of fighting over it physically, there are battles that are fought on the floor of the Senate. But these are important disagreements and they should be aired.
�Isn�t that what we are here for?�
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario